Putting History in its Place at The University of Chester

Since 2014 the Department of History & Archaeology at the University of Chester has been rediscovering its specialism in the history of place, space, and landscape. Hosting the Royal Historical Society Symposium in 2017 played an important part in that process. Papers delivered at that Symposium by Oleg Benesch, Elizabeth Tingle, and William Whyte have recently been published in TRHS 6th Series, XXVIII (2018).

In this blog post the Symposium organizers – Jenny Hillman, Tom Pickles, and Katherine Wilson – reflect on the various ways that Chester has been putting history in its place.

Cyclical history

The author of Ecclesiastes 1:9 famously declared that ‘What has been will be again, what has been done will be done again; there is nothing new under the sun.’ This is certainly true of histories of place, space, and landscape at Chester. Before our arrival, Graeme White and James Pardoe had run a very successful MA in Landscape, Heritage, and Society with close connections to the Chester Society for Landscape History. Sadly this MA had been discontinued by when we were appointed. Soon after his arrival at Chester in 2013, Tom was treated to a fantastic day touring the sites in Cheshire that Graeme used for fieldtrips for his medieval landscapes module and which contributed to the genesis of Graeme’s wonderful book, The Medieval English Landscape 1000-1540 (Bloomsbury, 2012).

To foster collaborations across disciplines and build on existing strengths, the Department decided to launch a new inter-disciplinary MA in Past Landscapes and Environments (affectionately known as MAPLE). Shared between History and Archaeology, MAPLE channels expertise in landscapes from prehistory to the twentieth century and fosters skills in the theory and practice of landscape analysis. Thinking Through Landscapes and Environments considers western and non-western histories of place, space, and landscape, taking in approaches like sensory history, psycho-geography, and environmental history. Investigating Past Landscapes explores practical skills in documentary and cartographic research, Geographical Information Systems, LiDAR and aerial photography, and onomastics.

The RHS Symposium 2017

HISTSYMP-9To capitalise on this energy, we applied to host the Royal Historical Society Symposium under the title ‘Putting History in its Place: Historic Landscapes and Environments’. Observing that ‘All human action is emplaced within historically specific and contingent landscapes and environments’ we made the bold claim that ‘These are not merely canvasses on which human action is played out, but constitute active social and cultural agents in producing change.’ The Symposium was designed to encourage historians to speak across the regional and period divisions that often shape our research.

HISTSYMP-1The Roundtable

Before the Symposium, members of the History staff at Chester contributed to a roundtable event based on our own landscape research interests, ranging from Clare Hickman on gardens in eighteenth-century medical history, to Tim Grady on First World War British internment camps, to Hannah Ewence on British Jewish identity and urban landscapes in twentieth-century Britain, and Rebecca Andrew on regional identity and rural landscapes in inter-War and post-War Britain.

The Keynotes

At the Symposium, three scholars well-known for their work on landscapes gave keynote lectures focusing on the medieval, early modern, and modern periods. John Blair drew on his Leverhulme funded project on Anglo-Saxon settlement to ask and answer the question ‘Was there such a place as Anglo-Saxon England’ through a formidable range of approaches to the relationship between material culture, landscape, and identity. His brilliant book from this project is now available as Building Anglo-Saxon England  (2018) has recently been shortlisted for the 2019 Wolfson History Prize. Elizabeth Tingle explored embodied holiness and long-distance pilgrimage in the Catholic Reformation ranging across an impressive body of European evidence to recapture the experience of religious travel. William Whyte outlined a persuasive thesis on the current scholarly ‘re-enchantment of the world’, pointing out that we have been here before, gently chastising us for our assumptions about agency and landscape, and suggesting historians should reconstruct ‘regimes of materiality’. His latest book Unlocking the Church: The Lost Secrets of Victorian Sacred Space (2017) followed close on the heels of the Symposium.

The Papers

Alongside these keynote addresses a series of papers by scholars from Britain and North America and grouped by theme encouraged discussion across regions and periods. For the Landscape and Identity panel, we were taken from the early modern woodlands of New England (Julie Schlag, Hull) and early modern coastal wetlands of Atlantic Canada (David F. Duke, Acadia) to the nineteenth-century agricultural landscape of Handley, North Dorset (Leo Baker, Bristol). To consider Sacred and Liminal Spaces we were transported from late medieval Canterbury Cathedral (Dee Dyas and John Jenkins, Christianity and Culture, York) via early modern parish churches (Emma Wells, York) and early modern Dutch landscapes of urban life and execution (Anuradha Gobin, Calgary), to landscapes of grave-digging in nineteenth- and twentieth-century England (Stuart Prior, Britsol and Helen Frisby, UWE). In the final panel on Place and Affect, we visited the frontier settlements of Chester (Graeme White, Chester), the urban castles of Japan in the later nineteenth and earlier twentieth century (Oleg Benesch, York), and later twentieth-century British nuclear bunkers (Jonathan Hogg, Liverpool, and Jessica Douthwaite, Stirling/ Imperial War Museums).

The Legacy

Organizing the Symposium helped us to reinforce existing collaborations and generate new ones; these results are visible in a number of ways.

  • Spiritual Landscapes and Pilgrimage: Jenny Hillman and Elizabeth Tingle have co-edited a volume of essays on spiritual journeys in medieval and early modern Europe. “Soul Travel” is now in press with Peter Lang (Oxford) and features contributions from scholars across the UK and Europe.
  • Early Christian Churches and Landscapes: Tom Pickles was just beginning his AHRC funded Research Network, ‘Early Christian Churches and Landscapes’, which has since held two conferences and four workshops to lay the foundations for a new digital database of the evidence for churches before 1100 across Britain and Ireland.
  • The Mobility of Objects Across Boundaries: Katherine Wilson successfully landed another AHRC funded Research Network focusing on ‘The Mobility of Objects Across Boundaries, 1000-1700’. This is considering how an object-centred approach might help us to escape the traditional periodisations and explanations for historical changes to material culture. It is about to hold its second workshop.
  • A Sense of Chester: Clare Hickman and Rebecca Andrew worked with Barry Taylor and Amy Gray-Jones (Archaeology) and the Storyhouse Chester to put on a series of events for the Being Human Festival 2017. These encouraged members of the public to join a virtual foraging expedition and learn how prehistoric people used their senses; to experience Dr John Hope’s eighteenth-century botanical teaching sensorium; and to record and share their sensory experiences of twenty-first century Chester.
  • Diverse Narratives: Building on their AHRC subject-centre grant through further funding from the Heritage Lottery Fund, Tim Grady and Hannah Ewence have continued to pursue their project on Diverse Narratives: Cheshire in World War I. This has raised awareness amongst the local communities of Cheshire that they are surrounded by a landscape reflecting and commemorating the participation of minorities in the War, and has included a parallel project to increase knowledge and understanding of the Handforth internment and prisoner of war camp.

REF2021 Update – April 2019

Updated Guidance on Submissions and Panel Working Criteria for REF2021

The UK’s four higher education (HE) funding bodies responsible for delivering the next Research Excellence Framework (REF2021) published their Final Guidance on Submissions and Panel Working Criteria on 31 January 2019.   This was accompanied by a document offering institutions guidance on drafting their Codes of Practice. REF2021 requires institutions to develop, document and apply a Code of Practice to ensure the fair and transparent identification of staff with significant responsibility for research.  All such staff in qualifying units must be submitted to the REF.

The publication of the Final Guidance follows a consultation with HEIs and Learned Societies to which the RHS submitted a response. REF has published a rationale as to how these key decisions on new aspects of the framework were reached.

The REF is structured into four main panels A-D. Panel D contains the Arts and Humanities subjects and is further divided into Units of Assessment (UoA), each of which will be assessed by a separate Sub-Panel.  History is Unit of Assessment 28.

Professor Dinah Birch (Department of English, University of Liverpool), the Chair of Main Panel D, presented a set of slides at a recent meeting of the Arts and Humanities Alliance. These summarise the main changes and clarifications within the REF guidelines following the consultation.  We are pleased to share those slides here.

The slides cover:

  • Research independence
  • Staff in non UK-based units
  • Co-authorship statements
  • Submitting co-authored outputs more than once
  • Version of output to be submitted
  • Double weighting
  • Continued impact case studies
  • Increased focus on equality and diversity in environment

When consulting the slide set, please remember that these guidelines can differ from one main panel to another. In the case of History, it is the stipulations relating to Main Panel D that are relevant. We have added a slide of brief notes to Professor Birch’s presentation to draw attention to areas that we feel are of particular relevance to our members. Professor Birch reflects on the changes in relation to Panel D here.

The RHS is disappointed that many of the suggestions in our consultation response, raising concerns echoed by other organisations within the sector, appear not to have been taken up by REF – notably those regarding the mechanisms for ensuring equality and diversity within submissions.

The RHS will continue to provide information to its members on the evolution of REF 2021, and ensure that any advice regarding the compilation of submissions is widely shared.   We strongly recommend that those with responsibility for REF, or members seeking information about the evaluation process and outcomes, read the History Sub-Panel Report from 2014 available here.

Prothero Lecture

On 7 July, Professor Simon Dixon, of UCL’s School of Slavonic and East European Studies, delivered this year’s Prothero Lecture at the Cruciform Building in UCL. At the centenary of the Russian Revolution, Prof Dixon addressed the subject of ‘Orthodoxy & Revolution: The Restoration of the Russian Patriarchate in 1917’. You can watch a video of his lecture, and read his abstract below.

‘At the height of the October Revolution in Moscow – a much bloodier affair than the Bolshevik coup in Petrograd – the Orthodox Church installed Tikhon (Bellavin) as Russia’s first patriarch since 1700. At the most obvious level, this was a counter-revolutionary gesture aimed at securing firm leadership in a time of troubles. It was nevertheless a controversial move. Ecclesiastical liberals regarded a restored patriarchate as a neo-papal threat to the conciliarist regime they hoped to foster; and since Nicholas II had explicitly modelled himself on the Muscovite tsar Aleksei Mikhailovich, the potential for renewed conflict between church and state was clear long before 1917. This lecture will emphasise the extent to which a single individual haunted the whole debate. For, until the last moment, it was widely assumed that the new patriarch would be not the little-known Tikhon, but Archbishop Antonii (Khrapovitskii) [pictured above], whose attempts to model himself on Patriarch Nikon – the most divisive of seventeenth-century patriarchs – helped to make him the most controversial prelate of the age.’

Next year’s Prothero Lecture will take place on Friday 6 July 2018 at Mary Ward Hall in London, where Prof Carole Hillebrand (Edinburgh), will present a lecture on ‘Saladin’s Spin-Doctors’.